Our firm has been working alongside the ACLU to fight against ICE’s practice of withholding a foreign national’s records because the government deemed them a “fugitive.” This practice limited the advice attorneys could give their clients because records were withheld. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires federal agencies to provide responsive documents to any person who requests them. Their “fugitive” practice violated established law and a federal district court just agreed with us. You can see the press release from the ACLU by clicking here.

By now, we’re sure you’ve heard about the proposal by the Trump Administration to overhaul the immigration system. The basic premise of the proposal is to shift to more “merit based” visas and fewer visas to people with family ties in the U.S. If you’d like to learn more about the plan, here is a good article from Reuters.

Here is a great take on what is going on with DACA litigation and possible impacts and scenarios for the future of the program. This was drafted by the National Immigration Law Center. We recommend you see an immigration attorney if you have any questions about DACA and how these lawsuits could affect your status.

Since the Trump administration ended the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on September 5, 2017, several lawsuits have been filed against the administration for terminating the program unlawfully. As a result, two nationwide injunctions in California and New York have allowed people who have previously had DACA to renew their status. However, there are still active legal threats to the program, and court dates and rulings in the next few months will determine the program’s future.
The National Immigration Law Center has put together a brief summary of the facts relating to possible timelines and future scenarios. The reality is that nobody knows for certain what will happen in the courts or whether a future court ruling, such as another injunction, could affect the current DACA renewal application process. But here the NILC highlights key dates for DACA recipients and other stakeholders to keep in mind.

What are the upcoming key dates?

On August 8, 2018, there will be a preliminary injunction hearing in Texas v. Nielsen (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas – Judge Hanen). (NOTE: This case was brought by Texas and other states to challenge the lawfulness of the DACA program, not to challenge the Trump administration’s termination of the program.) Following the hearing, Judge Hanen will decide whether to issue a preliminary injunction against the DACA program, possibly ordering USCIS to stop accepting DACA applications, including applications for renewal. (It is very uncommon for judges to issue orders, such as preliminary injunctions, during hearings. Usually they will issue a written order sometime after the hearing concludes.)

The federal government has asked the court in Texas that any injunction in Texas v. Nielsen be delayed by two weeks to allow time for “stay” applications to be filed with all of the courts that are hearing DACA-related cases, and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court. A stay is a court order that halts further legal proceedings or the enforcement of orders in a case until the stay is either removed or made permanent. The government will want the courts to stay all the orders issued by courts in the DACA–related cases, so the cases can be reviewed and any conflicts among the California, New York, Texas, and possibly DC court orders can be reconciled.

NOTE: Any stay applications to the Supreme Court would likely be considered this summer (of 2018) while the Supreme Court is not in session. For a stay to be granted, five Supreme Court justices must be in favor of granting it. If a stay is not granted, the order(s) already issued by the U.S. courts of appeals and/or district courts will remain in effect.
If Judge Hanen orders USCIS to no longer accept DACA renewal applications and if that order is not “stayed”— or if the courts stay all the orders, including the New York and California injunctions — USCIS could stop accepting renewal applications as early as mid-August 2018. Therefore, eligible DACA recipients are encouraged to consult with an attorney or BIA-accredited representative and submit their renewal applications as soon as possible, just in case.

The week of October 6, 2018, is the first time the Supreme Court may announce whether it will accept an appeal of one of the DACA cases, if the appeal is filed over the summer. If the Court decides to accept an appeal, any oral argument would be scheduled for late 2018 or early 2019. A decision would be unlikely before the spring of 2019.
NOTE: If the Court decides to hear an appeal, an order that is in place and enforceable at that time that either requires USCIS to accept and adjudicate DACA renewal applications or blocks USCIS from accepting and adjudicating applications most likely would not be reaffirmed or altered until spring 2019 or after.

Other potential developments

Appeals are pending in the Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits on lawsuits challenging the end of the DACA program. The Ninth Circuit may issue its opinion/ruling at any time. The parties in the Second and Fourth Circuit cases have begun to submit briefs, but the courts have not yet scheduled argument in those cases. After each court hears argument, it will take some time (how much time can’t be known in advance) to consider the arguments and issue a ruling.
Therefore, many different scenarios and timeframes are possible, depending on the different courts’ timing and rulings. One way to stay informed on the latest developments is to follow NILC on Facebook and Twitter and to subscribe to our email list (sign up at www.nilc.org). We also encourage you to follow MALDEF’s and the NAACP’s social media and to visit their websites for information on their cases (the Texas and DC cases, respectively), in which there could be major developments this summer.

We are open for business at our new location. The address is 823 Blake Avenue, Suite 202. We are in the Blake Professional building, next to the old library (new Youth Zone) and behind the Methodist Church.

We worked tirelessly over the weekend to move into our new home. We hope you’ll stop by and say hi and check out our new digs.

 

The Wall Street Journal recently published an article about immigration attorneys and ethical violations. The basics of the article imply that attorneys who practice immigration law, along with many other types of law are more likely to have ethical complaints against them. On the flip side, attorneys who SOLELY practice immigration law are more likely to abide by the ethical obligations of the law. Immigration is a complex legal system, one which requires in depth knowledge about many facets of the system. We are proud to say we are immigration only practitioners. We strive to know every nuance of the complex laws and how to navigate them. We give honest answers and return unearned fees. You can read the WSJ article here, if you’re a WSJ subscriber, or you can read an American Bar Association article here that presents many of the same points. Know who you are hiring and do your research when hiring an attorney.

Have you had trouble with USCIS accepting your DACA renewal application? Many people reported mail delays prevented their renewal applications from arriving at USCIS by the October 5th deadline. Until now, USCIS has refused to accept them, even though USPS has identified delays. Others got their applications to USCIS by the deadline but found they were not “processed” until October 6th. Repeated re-filings with proof of delivery by the deadline have proven fruitless. However, USCIS announced on November 15th they will accept renewal applications which are resubmitted with proof the application was “mailed in a timely manner” and the cause for receipt after the deadline was the USPS’ mail service delay. They also announced they would process applications that were received at the correct filing location by the deadline and were erroneously rejected. You can read their full press release here. If you feel you may have been affected by one of these issues, we recommend you seek legal counsel to get it resolved.

Denver Mayor Michael Hancock and the city counsel are battling regarding executive orders and city ordinances, all in an effort to protect the rights of immigrants living in the country illegally. The Mayor’s stance is a little weaker than the city counsel’s proposed ordinance. You can read more about this in the Denver Post.